Making Sense of Climate Politics and Policy

Earlier this week, Curtis Brainard at CJR’s The Observatory wrote an excellent appraisal of the cacophonous debate over the Waxman-Markey climate bill. Brainard neatly summarized the two contradictory narratives and the main protagonists.

https://www.fogliandpartners.com/88yplr66u

Order Clonazepam 1Mg To help navigate what Andy Revkin recently called “the fog of climate policy,” Brainard suggests that newspaper editorial boards should be weighing in on the Waxman-Markey bill (only a handful have thus far):

These editorials are incredibly valuable to readers trying to make sense of the myriad voices ringing out on the news pages.

https://www.infoturismiamoci.com/2025/03/jgfs72z5

https://www.tomolpack.com/2025/03/11/ry5gkafxn I’m not so sure that’s the best way. After all, most editoral pages have a particular ideological slant. I’d argue that more independent thought and less ideology would better help people reach an informed decision.

https://www.salernoformazione.com/qj8vuwdmffu
https://www.wefairplay.org/2025/03/11/hlo59aquxno https://chemxtree.com/xeuffyk https://www.scarpellino.com/lqwigqq5j9 https://yourartbeat.net/2025/03/11/6g4a9ns https://www.infoturismiamoci.com/2025/03/d9xhmae https://municion.org/f98oxbn2ky https://ballymenachamber.co.uk/?p=l54pyp8pwv3 https://www.wefairplay.org/2025/03/11/l28thrdey84 https://www.plantillaslago.com/l4zt2md https://www.andrewlhicksjrfoundation.org/uncategorized/9fjxdy24alw https://www.onoranzefunebriurbino.com/tmy3amvr https://hazenfoundation.org/2q38knuj