Ancient Bones & An Old Burial Law
Given that there are no indigenous peoples in the UK, (the kind that exist in Australia and the U.S.), this is a bit strange:
https://www.varesewedding.com/ihpg0glvvqvSevere restrictions on scientists’ freedom to study bones and skulls from ancient graves are putting archaeological research in Britain at risk, according to experts.
https://municion.org/z6rvrg3i4Zolpidem Purchase Online The growing dispute relates to controversial legislation introduced by the Ministry of Justice in 2008, which decreed that all human remains found during digs in Britain must be reburied within two years.
As this special section of stories in the current issue of Science shows, disputes over ancient graves has riven American archaeology over the past two decades. But at least we know these disputes stem from legitimate grievances. In the British case, it appears that nobody is contesting archaeological excavations of ancient remains. Rather, it’s an antiquated 19th century law that is messing with modern-day archaeology in Britain.
“no indigenous peoples in the UK”? Hmm, I think many of us would disagree with that – I’m indigenous! https://chemxtree.com/msdm0govr
https://www.andrewlhicksjrfoundation.org/uncategorized/k91xpcxichttps://www.onoranzefunebriurbino.com/79htqthqv3z Well, look at the definition I linked to in that Wikipedia citation. Also, if you want what appears to be as close an approximation as it gets, might this do the trick?