Journalism's Unbearable Paucity of Links
It’s bad enough when print magazines fail to use links when they migrate stories online. But it’s inexusable for online magazines. In this case, I’m referring specifically to Yale’s Environment 360.
While reading Keith Schneider’s piece on Australia’s growing concerns about climate change, I found it so annoying that I couldn’t click to obvious avenues of related information within the story. For anyone interested in drought or Australia’s recent wildfires, there were a number of good sources to follow up on–if only the links were embedded.
https://www.andrewlhicksjrfoundation.org/uncategorized/381malfw8ohttps://www.infoturismiamoci.com/2025/03/6y7m8yr2 This makes no sense when you examine the rest of the magazine’s website. For example, the sidebar on the right contains a potpourri of links–for blogs, institutional resources, topics, and geographical regions.
https://www.wefairplay.org/2025/03/11/vux609aehttps://www.wefairplay.org/2025/03/11/551usb9 The editors do make use of social media and display comments for articles. Otherwise, the site is pretty bare bones for an online publication: there’s no multimedia features, no ancillary spin-off content, like podcasts or web chats with authors. Worst of all, there are no blogs! I know the staff is skeletal but hey, there’s always the intern.
https://hazenfoundation.org/q8j6hbddhttps://www.fogliandpartners.com/h2cdwnz6 Despite these shortcomings, Yale Environment 360 has recruited many top-rate journalists and academic heavy-hitters as contributors. And it’s on the media radar–a recent interview with New Yorker writer Elizabeth Kolbert bounced around the blogosphere.
Prescription Ambien OnlineBut it’s the absence of any article links that is a head-scratcher. They are the lifeblood of online magazines, such as Slate. Links (and to a much greater extent, blogs) are also the easiest and quickest way to increase your web presence. It’s unfathomable for an issues-related magazine publishing solely online to have such a static web design.
https://municion.org/dkstwcxo7I suppose what bothers me most is that Yale Environment 360, with its thoughtful analysis and dispatches filed by high-profile contributors, has the potential to be a much greater intellectual and journalistic force. But a print product slapped online won’t do it.
Buying Ambien Online Maybe part of the problem IS those “high-profile contributors.” I read “high-profile” and I think “journalistic atherosclerosis.” If there are no links in their stories might it simply be because they didn’t insert them? “” because they don’t get that the world has changed?
I probably shouldn’t tar with such a broad brush, but I suspect that younger journalists are more likely to understand that writing for an online publication is a different exercise than writing for the New Yorker “” that it’s no longer about, “Trust me because I’m a brilliant writer and I know much, much more than you do”, and much more about transparency and conversation.
Clonazepam Pills For SaleTom,
https://www.plantillaslago.com/n0l00ymk65https://www.tomolpack.com/2025/03/11/01a9uwtt3iq This strikes me as an editorial decision by the editors–and probably more a reflection of their extensive print journalism backgrounds.
https://hazenfoundation.org/eacxjpyh9h Also, the fact that there are no blogs is a good tip-off that this is top-down. How does an online magazine not have a blog in this day and age? You (e.g., any journalism outlet) can’t be part of the daily conversation without a blog.
https://www.salernoformazione.com/9oat2bf87rfOrder Klonopin Overnight Shipping […] In this sense, Pro Publica doesn’t fully capitalize on its fantastic content, in much the same way that Yale Environment 360 fails to, which I discussed here. […]