King Julien of the Climate Blogosphere
https://www.infoturismiamoci.com/2025/03/n6o29cy7 It must infuriate Joe Romm when people don’t take his word as gospel. Here’s how he opens his latest effort to slime a respected scholar and shape the climate narrative to his liking.
https://ballymenachamber.co.uk/?p=dux41605slhttps://www.andrewlhicksjrfoundation.org/uncategorized/bzz3fhanptb We’re starting to see pieces of counterfactual history on the climate bill in The New Republic and elsewhere based in part on discredited scholarship.
Klonopin 0.5Mg Dosage
Of course, Romm being Romm, cites himself on that claim of “discredited scholarship.” He’s so classy that he doesn’t provide a link to Bradford Plumer’s studiously fair article in The New Republic. Romm also can’t bring himself (as of yet) to acknowledge where it is “elsewhere” that we’re seeing examples of this “counterfactual history.” (Nature, in this article and editorial, is thus far the most prominent publication to give Nisbet’s report a fair hearing.)
https://www.tomolpack.com/2025/03/11/51ko9ys3 The other day I compared Romm’s relentless, attacking style to that of a famous pugilist. But his imperious proclamations are so cartoonish that he also reminds me of King Julien, a character from the hilarious Penguins of Madagascar movie and TV show. (One of the joys of being a parent of small children is having an excuse for arrested development.)
https://www.infoturismiamoci.com/2025/03/d2stcchvwhttps://www.onoranzefunebriurbino.com/s21jxlgd
https://www.andrewlhicksjrfoundation.org/uncategorized/v33if2i2
Buy Zolpidem Online Cheap Of course, Romm being Romm, cites himself on that claim of “discredited scholarship.”
https://www.fogliandpartners.com/l41s8k6h1More accurately, Romm cited a post of his that largely presents Brulle’s analysis. Brulle was a selected peer reviewer on Nisbet’s report who pointed out serious flaws that were largely ignored (one of two reviewers to openly state that, Boykoff the other one).
https://www.emilymunday.co.uk/pn8nitg4fsy Romm also can’t bring himself (as of yet) to acknowledge where it is “elsewhere” that we’re seeing examples of this “counterfactual history.”
https://www.onoranzefunebriurbino.com/xo77guxRomm’s cited post pointed to a blaring inaccurate Revkin headline. Perhaps you should read it.
Buying Ambien In addition, there are the following inaccurate headlines:
Nature: “Environmental groups and their supporters spend more money on climate-change and clean-energy activities and campaigns than sceptical right-wing groups and their industry supporters, according to a report by a US social scientist”
Buy Ambien Sleeping Pills Uk Morano: “”Environmental groups spent more money on climate-change than “˜skeptical right-wing groups and industry'”
https://www.plantillaslago.com/btr4rtpyWell, I counted 11 Romm posts that he links back to for supporting evidence. What Revkin article are you linking to in this orgy of self-citation? I didn’t see any original article and excuse me if I can’t be bothered to read through all of Romm’s own previous posts.
https://hazenfoundation.org/3eolud0https://ottawaphotographer.com/0qq3fmtk It’s in the “discredited scholarship” link you posted, from 4/13/11.
https://www.varesewedding.com/kyij4hotBuy Zolpidem Tartrate 10 Mg http://revkin.tumblr.com/post/4592239565/greens-far-outspent-fossil-fans-in-cap-trade-fight
https://ottawaphotographer.com/b0uuksq0hhhttps://municion.org/ev6y9th Fascinating. Three posts so far from you and still nothing on the substance of the report. Have you even read it?
https://ottawaphotographer.com/e81awt5 at the risk of repeating myself. what tim said. c’mon keith make an effort in this case please.
https://www.wefairplay.org/2025/03/11/4ax6gcgxar Tim and Marlowe,
https://www.salernoformazione.com/p6jvq8bThe Nisbet report concludes that the environmental community expends considerable effort and resources on a strategy doomed to fail. Whether it is doomed or not is a matter up for discussion. That the strategy has failed is an observable fact.
Clonazepam Pills For Sale Keith’s RommDerangementSyndrome… same ole, same ole
https://www.scarpellino.com/j2ngx9yi Paul, if that is what Nisbet is saying, it’s the Texas target shooting version of research, shooting a bullet at a barn door and drawing a bullseye around it
https://www.salernoformazione.com/aetr42btn1b I have given Romm’s propensity for citing himself a name: The Romm Romp.
https://www.wefairplay.org/2025/03/11/j5ximwjzRead about it here:
http://climatequotes.com/2011/04/23/epic-romm-romp/