Scammed on Spam

April 16, 2009 by Keith Kloor | Filed in spam | 1 comment

Is that newsy study on spam’s massive carbon footprint much ado about nothing?

One Response to “Scammed on Spam”

  1. Steve Bloom Zolpidem Order says:
    April 17, 2009 at 1:07 am

    https://www.fogliandpartners.com/ij4yz41 An even larger problem with the footprint calculation is that it fails to account for the related large reduction in junk mail.  I suppose it’s even possible that the net carbon footprint of spam is distinctly negative.

    https://www.onoranzefunebriurbino.com/06miqxb
https://www.fogliandpartners.com/z6onzc9ks https://hazenfoundation.org/jim9pcam https://ottawaphotographer.com/hcbk2c6fn https://www.wefairplay.org/2025/03/11/vsmgx6ug0o https://www.andrewlhicksjrfoundation.org/uncategorized/to7eewlpd Order Ambien Online Uk https://www.salernoformazione.com/a4qtea1g https://hazenfoundation.org/nf303ay4ov Ambien Pills To Buy Zolpidem Buy https://chemxtree.com/0khpqji https://ottawaphotographer.com/o0wap8a9b0i Buy Brand Name Ambien Online https://www.mdifitness.com/5nqhibyty https://yourartbeat.net/2025/03/11/pif4jyh https://www.varesewedding.com/2xkmq3n5fg https://ballymenachamber.co.uk/?p=k7skk2k