Muller's Star Turn in Climate Soap Opera
Last year, Berkley physicist Richard Muller excited the climate world with this WSJ op-ed:
https://www.emilymunday.co.uk/re95hlrx4b2 The Case Against Global Warming Skepticism
https://www.andrewlhicksjrfoundation.org/uncategorized/2ty7vam He touted his Berkley team’s preliminary re-analysis of temperature trends that, as Brad Plumer drily noted,
Cheapest Zolpidem appears to have confirmed the basic tenets of climate science.
https://www.salernoformazione.com/1je1vbuak At the time, many climate scientists rolled their eyes at Muller’s grandstanding announcement, but because he was a darling of climate skeptics and his work was partially funded by the Koch brothers, it was all great fodder for the long-running soap opera, “As the Climate World Turns.”
https://yourartbeat.net/2025/03/11/v6dfr6mchb Today, Muller is back in the news with what seems like a slightly tweaked re-run of the original episode.
https://chemxtree.com/zdmek14 Roger Pielke Jr. yawns and Joe Romm calls it a bombshell. As this latest over-hyped drama plays out, I wonder if anyone will notice that Muller, in his current NYT piece, has foreshadowed his next op-ed (in the Washington Post?) sometime in the next year or two. In case you missed it:
https://www.scarpellino.com/myzfm9e88m0 I still find that much, if not most, of what is attributed to climate change is speculative, exaggerated or just plain wrong. I’ve analyzed some of the most alarmist claims, and my skepticism about them hasn’t changed.
https://www.onoranzefunebriurbino.com/pbdqk45kev2 How clever is that?! In one swoop, he throws a bone to the Koch Brothers while setting the stage for his next conversion.
https://yourartbeat.net/2025/03/11/qcu0kdz So he’s going to write an op-ed about “alarmist
strawmenclaims” polar bears, MWP, 2035? That would be almost as new as claiming that the temperature has risen and mankind is mostly responsible!https://www.scarpellino.com/32ycue24t Your post captures my reaction exactly.
Sleeping Pills Zolpidem Buy I did notice that particular paragraph. What is “much?” Does he think it’s “most” or not?
https://hazenfoundation.org/24ega14dy Is he saying that he thinks that “most” of what is attributed to climate change is speculative? Well, isn’t that why error bars and CIs are included in analytical assessments? How does he determine which claims are the “most alarmist?” What constitutes “skepticism” about those claims, and who isn’t skeptical about the claims? (I.e., does being skeptical mean being less than 100% sure that the claims are accurate?)
https://www.varesewedding.com/kq2zq3u1j I fail to see why he refers to himself as a reformed “skeptic.” The logic of that paragraph is perfectly in line with much of what I read in the skept-o-sphere (yes, I stole it).
[…] Panel on Climate Change. Here’s the general flow of events, which are — as Keith Kloor noted overnight — “great fodder for the long-running soap opera, ‘As the Climate World […]
I detect the same mischievous grasping of the chance for notoriety previously exhibited on the skeptic side by Monckton and the alarmist side by Mann.
https://www.salernoformazione.com/63cz0rk2ocz I’m okay with it, because I think BEST is a worthwhile addition to our knowledge base. But I ain’t looking at Muller’s various pronouncements as anything other than self-aggrandizement…
Its worth noting that the Berkeley Earth site currently says: “New Berkeley Earth analysis Coming Soon. Berkeley Earth will be releasing its latest results and analysis on Monday 30 July.”All we have right now is an op-ed, as interesting as that is.
https://www.fogliandpartners.com/7b9c2chm Zeke,According to Revkin, who said he got it from Curry, “she’ll be posting a long analysis of the new paper later today written by Steven Mosher and Zeke Hausfather, who have examined the Berkeley work on her blog before.” Accurate?
Ambien Cheapest Online Muller must cause involuntary muscle twitching and painful cognitive dissonance in Alarmist ground troops. They have been trained to despise anyone who goes off narrative like Muller does when he spits on their talking points of AGW- induced derechos and what not. It. Does. Not. Compute.
https://www.emilymunday.co.uk/69vz6tx Interesting in that he now claims attribution to CO2 for recent temperature rise. A win for the climate home team. Not so much for the CAGW team. I’m not so convinced by the “it’s the best correlation we can find so it must be true” argument but he states the case well and also is quite transparent with his data and methods. A model for good science. He also makes his best guess of where it is going which also adds credibility and some test ability.
https://chemxtree.com/h4fgpv04v I didn’t understand, what he attributes the LIA to. If it’s not Sun and it couldn’t be CO2 then LIA sets the scale for natural variability that is not correlated with anything we know.
https://www.tomolpack.com/2025/03/11/7bm5r4h Thus his attribution logic is unclear.
https://ballymenachamber.co.uk/?p=m69tbr821 Sashka
https://www.andrewlhicksjrfoundation.org/uncategorized/5kk3i00 Thus his attribution logic is unclear.
Looked at another way, known climate behaviour (eg LIA; MWP) in response to what are apparently small changes in forcing does rather suggest that feedbacks must net positive. An insensitive climate system would not – Buy Zolpidem Online Uk could not – behave as observed. So Muller’s view that CO2 forcing is the most plausible cause of modern warming does make sense.
https://www.infoturismiamoci.com/2025/03/avd7zcsw If he is happy to lie about his “conversion” then what else is he lying about?http://www.populartechnology.net/2012/06/truth-about-richard-muller.html
Order Ambien Canada #8 An insensitive climate system would not ““ https://www.mdifitness.com/3ggm34ilja could not ““ behave as observed.It could if sensitivity was non-linear. Lot’s of stuff in nature exhibits behavior similar to a sine wave. We already know that clouds can be either positive or negative feed backs.
https://yourartbeat.net/2025/03/11/kc4aif3t My, aren’t we cynical?
@12
The point is that the system is rich and complex enough to both swing away and back to equilibrium. This means that there both positive and negative feedbacks.
Can You Buy Ambien In Canada grypo, Can U Buy Ambien In Mexico Accurate. Though at the time we were unsure if it would be posted around midnight EST or earlier in the day. The original plan was to release everything around midnight, but then Reason somehow was leaked the results early and everything sped up.
https://www.scarpellino.com/4p3gnvuk Sashka, harrywr2
https://www.plantillaslago.com/lbexfdqgt Thanks for confirming that you really do not understand the basics at all.
Does anyone else find anything a tad ironic here?:
https://www.andrewlhicksjrfoundation.org/uncategorized/1qriyzql From Pielke Sr.
Buy Real Zolpidem Diogenes would have had more difficulty if he’d searched for a humble climate scientist.
https://www.emilymunday.co.uk/31o9jvksg Joshua says:”Does anyone else find anything a tad ironic here?”Watts pulled a Muller…
Clonazepam Generic Buy – If astrology were true, twins would have the same fate.
https://www.salernoformazione.com/vav56hm6m3 -It is totally provable!
https://www.mdifitness.com/pgdcfwc -From gypsies?
https://chemxtree.com/fnub4vfoof9 – Why wouldn’t it have an influence on our personalities?
– You know who believes this? My babysitter.
There is more crime during the full moon.
Well, who knows?
It’s like the universe knows this stuff.
You guys just don’t get the fundamental basics.
http://www.script-o-rama.com/movie_scripts/h/husbands-and-wives-script-transcript.html
If **Hamlet** was true, it would always be played the same way.
**Hamlet** always have the same fate, so **Hamlet** is true.
The EPR paradox shows that physics is not true anyway.
Well, at least according to our Knight of Ni’s truth, which is just a bit weaker than Chuck Norris truth.
Next batch of bovine manure has arrived.
Have I steered our Knight of Ni wrong?
Enjoy my vacation,
w
Ah, the Koch brothers! Where once we had ‘the Jews,’ now we have a bogeyman for a new age. Stay classy.
LOL, MarkB, gotta love this, given how you AGW denier crybabies whine that you’re tarred with a Holocaust brush.
The presence of Black Knight is irrelevant. His absence is always welcome.
#24: George Soros